Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Etheridge

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1977No. 761SC881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Petitioner does not contest the trial court’s ruling that Item X of the will was valid. He does, however, contend that the court erred in concluding that the intestate share of Doc Etheridge, Sr. should first be satisfied from the lands devised to Doc Etheridge, Jr. and his sons, Joe and Owen.

At the threshold of our considerations in this case, we are confronted with the question of whether a real party in interest was substituted in this action when Doc Etheridge, Sr. died. Every action must be prosecuted in the names of the real party in interest. G.S. 1-57.

If, as in the case…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Purvis v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Service Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Dixon v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Etheridge v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Etheridge v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API