Legal Opinion

Lovingston v. Bauchens

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 4, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of East St Louis; the Hon. Benjamin H. Canby, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtBeeves, P. J.

This action is case. The declaration states that plaintiff was walking and leading his horse along a street in the city of East St. Louis, using ordinary care for his own safety, when a servant of the defendants carelessly drove a horse and buggy against plaintiff’s horse, which caused him to jump, and jerk plaintiff upon the sidewalk, whereby he was greatly injured, etc. The general issue was filed and a trial had, which resulted in a judgment for plaintiff for $700, to reverse which this appeal is prosecuted.

It is urged that plaintiff’s own negligence materially contributed to his injury.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Waldron v. MarcierIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. James v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Gordner v. St. Louis Screw Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Dumontier v. Stetson & Post Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API