Legal Opinion
Paul Bishop v. Office of Personal Management
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 28, 2013No. 12-3740UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Paul J. Bishop appeals pro se from the order of the District Court dismissing his complaint. We will affirm.
The Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) terminated Bishop’s employment as a border protection specialist in 2007. Bishop sought review by the Office of Special Counsel, which rejected his challenge, and then appealed to the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”), which upheld his termination. See Bishop v. DHS, No. 2:10-cv-1095, 2010 WL 5392897, at *1 (D.N.J. Dec.21, 2010). The civil action at issue here is Bishop’s third arising from these events.
Bishop’s first complaint…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- McDonnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Carl L. Baker v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Diana Douglas v. Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
4Cited by3 opinions
- Paul Bishop v. AGRICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Rodriguez v. NoemDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- STUDENT 1 v. NOEMDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025