Hammond and Thomason v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

We have reviewed the facts, and the conclusion is expressed that no error was committed in refusing to instruct the jury to acquit the accused if they believed that the money was taken from the injured party by force or if they had a reasonable doubt upon that subject.

The appellants’ contention that the evidence of the result of the search was improperly received is regarded as having been properly decided on the original hearing. In this motion for rehearing the appellants apparently fail to take note of the distinction between the facts…