Legal Opinion

Manning v. Gagne

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 29, 1939No. 3507PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLELLAN, District Judge.

This appeal of the plaintiffs from a judgment for the defendant comes here with the District Judge’s findings of fact, rulings of law and a transcript of the evidence. The crucial question is whether the finding that two transfers of stock by a taxpayer to his son, while in form sales, were in fact gifts, should stand. If sales, the taxpayer was entitled to a tax deduction. If gifts, no such deduction'was allowable, and the action can not be maintained. The trial was without jury, and in such cases, the “substantial evidence” rule no longer applies. By virtue of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. BehanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. Madeira v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  3. Carpenter v. GagneDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ernest E. Burgess v. M/v Tamano, Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  2. Fleming v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. WinslowCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  4. Interlochen Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  5. United States v. StillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API