Legal Opinion

Miller's Administrator v. Miller

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Bill for specific performance. On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chasgelloh.

On the 10th of June, 1872, John B. Miller, now deceased, being the owner in fee of a tract of laud of forty-nine acres and twenty-four hundredths of an acre, situated in the township of Chatham, in the county of Morris, in this state, entered into an agreement with Jehiel K. Hoyt for the sale of those premises to the latter, for the price of $39,392. The agreement was in writing, and was signed by both parties. By it, Miller, for the consideration of that sum, agreed with Hoyt that he would well and sufficiently convey the land to Hoyt, his heirs and assigns, or to such person…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ensign v. ColburnNew York Court of Chancery · 1845

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hanson v. LevyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Butterer v. SantoroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. Righter v. First Reformed Church of BoontonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Stockfleth v. BrittenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  5. Courtney v. HansonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API