Bitsekas v. Parechanian
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiff, as a judgment creditor of the defendant Parechanian, brought this action to set aside a deed executed by the latter to the defendant Sarkisian, conveying a half interest in a tract of forty acres of land situated in Kings County, on the ground that said deed of conveyance was the result of a fraudulent conspiracy between the two defendants to prevent the plaintiff from securing satisfaction of a judgment previously obtained by plaintiff and against Parechanian in the superior court of Fresno County for the sum of $2,153.90.
According to the complaint, the plaintiff brought an…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- State, Department of Highways v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- People v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Turner v. WhittelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.