Legal Opinion

Bitsekas v. Parechanian

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1924No. Civ. No. 2733PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff, as a judgment creditor of the defendant Parechanian, brought this action to set aside a deed executed by the latter to the defendant Sarkisian, conveying a half interest in a tract of forty acres of land situated in Kings County, on the ground that said deed of conveyance was the result of a fraudulent conspiracy between the two defendants to prevent the plaintiff from securing satisfaction of a judgment previously obtained by plaintiff and against Parechanian in the superior court of Fresno County for the sum of $2,153.90.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff brought an…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State, Department of Highways v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  3. People v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Turner v. WhittelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API