Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Laas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 25, 1985No. 84-2169PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

In an action for construction of a will, limited to establishing a valid charitable remainder unitrust, certain beneficiaries of the trust brought a counterclaim against the executor and the other beneficiaries under the will.

The counterclaim sought to establish the existence of ambiguities in the will requiring judicial construction; however, the circuit court found the will clear and unambiguous and granted counterdefendants’ motion to dismiss the counterclaim. Counterplaintiffs filed this timely appeal.

The issues presented on appeal are whether ambiguities exist in the will requiring…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bond v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Illinois Land & Loan Co. v. BonnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Gridley v. GridleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Strauss v. StraussIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Alford v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Coussee v. Estate of EfstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. FIFTH THIRD BANK, NA v. RosenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. In Re Estate of JulianAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Fifth Third Bank v. RosenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API