Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Briscoe

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 8, 1963No. 16,282Published

1DissentFerguson, Judge

I dissent.

In my opinion, a warrant officer other than a commissioned warrant officer is an enlisted man for purposes of court-martial practice and may, therefore, properly be sentenced to either a bad-conduct discharge or a dishonorable discharge. The provision in the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, to the contrary provides a minimum penalty and is beyond the authority of the President. Accordingly, I would hold it void. To demonstrate the reasoning which leads me to this position, I turn to the record before us.

Charged with larceny of a bottle of hot sauce, black pepper, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. VarnadoreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. BellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. JobeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. EllmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API