Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irrigation Dist.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to compel the board of directors of an irrigation district to call an election upon the question of an assessment upon the property in the district. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Valentine & Newby, and McCutchen, Olney & Willard, for Petitioners.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an application in mandamus to compel the board of directors of Imperial Irrigation District to call an election upon the question of a two per cent assessment upon the property in the district, made under the provisions of section 59 of the so-called “Bridgford Act,” as amended in 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 1111). It is claimed that a petition for such election, signed by the required number of electors of the district, has been filed with the board, and that thereby an election is made mandatory, under the provisions of said section. This court is asked to hear evidence and…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Roma MacAroni Factory v. GiambastianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Matter of Application of BurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Keeley v. Superior Court of NevadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.