Legal Opinion

Motorists Mutual Ins. v. Auto Owners Mutual Ins.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1956No. 173PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, P. J.

The question presented by this appeal involves the ownership of a new 1952 Oldsmobile which was being purchased by one Thomas Boyd from the Dick Helman Auto Sales, Inc. The automobile herein was involved in a collision and the liability of the defendant insurance company depends upon the ownership of the car at the time of the accident, all the seller’s automobiles being covered in a policy of insurance with the defendant. If the ownership still remained in the Helman company, then it is conceded that the plaintiff should prevail in this action; on the other hand, if the title had passed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Workman v. Republic Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Automobile Finance Co. v. MundayOhio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grogan Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. GottfriedOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Webb v. GrimmOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Magid v. Cleveland HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API