Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gwinnett County

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1982No. 38043PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice.

Appellees, plaintiffs below, are Gwinnett County and ten property owners in Raintree Forest subdivision in Gwinnett County. Appellants Grady and C. W. Smith hold deeds to the recreation areas of Raintree Forest and five other subdivisions in Gwinnett County. Appellants Raymond and Karen Chatfield hold a deed to the recreational area of a sixth subdivision in Gwinnett County. Appellees filed in Gwinnett Superior Court a complaint asking for declaratory and injunctive relief.

The facts below were stipulated. At the time the subject properties were subdivided, the following…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Walker v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Smith v. BruceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Ross v. Hall County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Stanfield v. BrewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hearn v. Autumn Woods Office Park Property Owners AssociationMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hendley v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Jakobsen v. Colonial Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  4. Kaplan v. City of Sandy SpringsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Johnson & Harber Construction Co. v. BingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API