Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 16, 2005No. 92,570PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greene, J.:

Roger M. Smith appeals the district court’s summary denial of his motion for DNA testing pursuant to K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-2512. Concluding that such testing could not produce exculpatory evidence, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Smith pled guilty to one count of rape and one count of aggravated criminal sodomy in 1986. The record on appeal reflects that during his incarceration, he has written a host of letters to the district court and others, he has filed a plethora of postconviction motions, and his case has been before our appellate courts and *370prompted memorandum…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. State v. DenneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Bruner v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wimbley v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. People v. O'CONNELLAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. State v. WinslowNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API