Smith v. Pavan
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentPaul E. Danielson, Justice
I disagree with the majority’s holdings. I would affirm the circuit court’s order because the result reached therein was compelled by both the Pulaski County Circuit Court’s orders in Wright v. Smith, 60CV-13-2662, appeal dismissed sub nom. Smith v. Wright, 2015 Ark. 298 (per curiam), and by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2584, 192 L.Ed.2d 609 (2015).
First, the Pulaski County Circuit Court in Wñght entered a permanent injunction enjoining all defendants in that ease, which included Smith, from enforcing any state or local laws or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Mills v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- DeBoer v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.