Legal Opinion
Mississippi Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1984No. 82-4444PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from two orders by which the Federal Power Commission, now the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, approved plans to curtail deliveries of natural gas to customers of United Gas Pipe Line Company (United). The first order, issued October 31, 1975 in United Gas Pipe Line Company, Docket No. RP71-29, et al., 54 F.P.C. 1934, approved an interim settlement plan which governed curtailment on United’s system from November 1, 1975 to October 31, 1976. The second, issued October 8, 1982, ¶21 FERC ¶ 61,016, denied rehearing of the October 31, 1975 order and accepted a permanent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fort Pierce Utility Authority of the City of Fort Pierce v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- State of North Carolina and North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Philadelphia Gas Works, Gas Section, Georgia Municipal Ass'n, Washington Gas Light Company, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., Commissioners of Public Works of Greenwood, South Carolina, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Carolina Pipeline Company Public Service Electric and Gas Company, Delmarva Power and Light Company, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, and North Penn Gas Company, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Philadelphia Electric Company, American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc., Long Island Lighting Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Farmers Chemical Association, Inc., General Motors Corporation, South Carolina Public Service Commission, Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company, Cng Transmission Company, United Cities Gas Company, Intervenors. Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, Intervenors. Elizabethtown Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Delmarva Power & Light Company, Intervenors. Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carolina Pipeline Co., Intervenors. Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Piedmont Natural Gas Co., Inc., Intervenors. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Intervenors. South Jersey Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company and North Penn Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Northwest Pipeline Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, No. 87-1502Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Texasgulf, Inc. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Mississippi Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984