Legal Opinion

Baisch v. Publishers' Typographic Service, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 1, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gelmshaw, J. S. C.

The facts in this case are not in dispute and are, briefly, as follows:

Claimant, W. E. Hall Printing Co. (hereafter called. Hall), entered into a contract with the defendant, Publishers’ Typographic Service, Inc. (hereafter called Publishers’), the latter agreeing to set type for books which Hall printed. As part of the contractual undertaking Hall requested that Publishers’ keep its type intact for six months after the first publication of Hall’s books. Publishers’ objected to this request and the parties agreed on a compromise whereby Central Typesetting & Eleetrotyping…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas Roberts & Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  2. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Equity Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Chicago Title Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API