Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Trickey

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided December 28, 1998No. 97-0594PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVogel, J.

Respondent-appellant Benjamin J. Trickey (“B.J.”) appeals a district court ruling modifying the parties’ dissolution decree by increasing his alimony obligation from $1 to $1800 per month. We affirm as modified.

The marriage of B.J. and Terry Trickey was dissolved by decree on March 23, 1988. At the time, both parties were thirty-eight years old. Pursuant to stipulation, B.J. agreed to pay Terry $800 per month in alimony for a period of .three years and then one dollar per year thereafter. He was also ordered to pay a property settlement of $2000 per month for thirty-six months. In addition,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. In Re the Marriage of KernCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Adamson v. DodgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. McKinney v. McKinney (In re McKinney)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Brasslett v. Brasslett (In Re Brasslett)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1999
  4. Collett v. CollettNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Foster v. Burns (In re Foster)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API