Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Brizee

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1968No. Civ. 24168PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The City of Oakland (hereafter Oakland) and its auditor-controller (hereafter controller) appeal from a judgment declaring that respondent Marie Belle Barnett (hereafter Mrs. Barnett), the widow of a retired fireman, was entitled to a retirement allowance without the deduction of the amount of the workmen’s compensation death benefits award made to her minor child, respondent, Ronald Barnett (hereafter Ronald), and directing the issuance of a writ of mandate commanding such payments.

The facts are stipulated. Mrs. Barnett’s huband, Robert (hereafter decedent), a member of the Oakland Fire…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Healy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lyons v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. City of Oakland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. City & County of San Francisco v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Lyons v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API