Paramo v. Floyd
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LaROSE, Judge.
Diego Paramo and D.M.P. Builders and Associates, Inc. (collectively, “Paramo”), appeal the final default judgment entered against them and in favor of Vincent and Vianne Floyd. The Floyds sued Paramo for civil theft in connection -with a project to expand and remodel their home. The trial court erroneously awarded the Floyds unliquidated damages without an eviden-tiary hearing. Accordingly, we reverse the default judgment as to damages and remand for an evidentiary hearing. We affirm as to all other issues without further comment.
A default admits all well-pleaded allegations of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowman v. Kingsland Development, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Szucs v. QUALICO DEVELOPMENT, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- US FIRE INS. v. C & C Beauty Sales, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Rich v. SpiveyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Medcom USA, Inc. v. RYDER HOMES AND GROVES CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robert Maggiano, D.O., P.A. v. Whiskey Creek Professional Center, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Winding Wood Condominium VI Association, Inc. v. WallsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016