Legal Opinion

Walter Mark Flanagan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1962No. 19447_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

While the Court raised the question on its own motion concerning the timeliness of the notice of appeal, the circumstances are such that, giving the appellant the benefit of the doubt, we conclude that it was timely. But there is no doubt about the merits, and as it is clear that the appellant cannot prevail, the judgment is affirmed. This appeal is from a conviction of violating the White Slave Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421, on March 19, 1959. 1

The appellant contends that he was not given a speedy trial as required by the Sixth Amendment. We find no substance to this. Within a month of his trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Jack A. LustmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. James W. Harlow, Charles E. Wilson and Thomas F. Addy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. William Raymond Lindsey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Harold KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. Oscar Leon Franklin Snow, A/K/A Hank SnowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Billy Ross MoudyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. Thomas Edward Hanley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Elton Ray Barnes and Bunchie White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API