Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1983No. 78-4771 & 16-82-02966; CA A26904 & A26905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Husband filed an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property purportedly created by the decree dissolving the parties’ marriage. He moved for summary judgment. Wife also moved for summary judgment, contending that a mortgage was not created by the provision in the decree, and moved to modify the decree. The court granted wife’s motion for summary judgment, dismissed husband’s foreclosure action and modified the decree. Husband appeals the final judgments in both proceedings. The cases have been consolidated on appeal.

The dissolution decree, entered in 1979, provided:

“(b) The house of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garnett v. GarnettOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In re the Marriage of HoreskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Matter of Marriage of DeslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of RousseauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. In re the Marriage of HeathmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. In re BlomquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Daniel-Elliott and DanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. Spady v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API