Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Jensen

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William R. Brehhah, Je., J.

Petitioner, by order to show canse, seeks an order directing the respondent bank to pay petitioner the amount on deposit with it in the joint account of petitioner and respondent wife, which account has been blocked pursuant to section 134 of the Banking Law.

The preliminary question raised by this court upon its own volition is whether it may assume jurisdiction of the subject controversy, absent a plenary action. There is no authority for the commencement of an action or special proceeding in the manner undertaken here. An action is commenced by the service of a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Time Writers, Inc. v. ColemanNew York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API