Legal Opinion

Spanko v. Trisick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1932No. Appeal, 34PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Defendants appeal from an order of the court of common pleas discharging a rule to open a judgment entered upon a bond containing a warrant of attorney to confess judgment. The bond accompanied a mortgage executed August 29, 1927, from Peter L. Trisick and Pauline S, Trisick, Ms wife, to Julia Spanko. It was conditioned upon payment of $7,500, of wMch $3,750 was due and payable at expiration of five years from date of the instrument, and remainder at the end of ten years from its date. Subsequently the mortgage and bond were assigned to the Merchants and Miners State Bank of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Kelber v. Pittsb. N. Plow Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
  3. Earley's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Blauvelt v. KemonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Tressler v. EmerickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schuy'l T. Co. v. Sobolewski Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Rambo Building & Loan Ass'n v. DragoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. First Nat. Bk., Wmsbg., for Use v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Kaufman, Exrx. v. FeldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API