Legal Opinion

McMenomy v. Ruch

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1904No. S.F. No. 2982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. John Ellsworth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an election contest brought under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. Judgment was given in favor of the contestant, and from that judgment the contestee appeals. It was stipulated upon the trial that if sixty of the ballots east at the election in favor of the contestee had been counted for him by the court that the judgment should have been in his favor. The objection to these ballots was, that each contained an identifying mark, consisting of a cross placed by the voter in the square at the right of the words “No nomination” on the face of the ballot.

One contention of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Budd v. HoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Maddux v. WalthallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Treanor v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API