Legal Opinion

Maitland v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1944No. Appeal, 162Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a motion for judgment n. o. v. in a trespass action.

In view of a favorable verdict from the jury, the version of the plaintiff, though the only witness for her side, must be accepted.

At nearly 11:30 P. M. on June 3, 1943, the plaintiff was riding in a trolley of a line which terminates at Wayne Avenue and Carpenter Lane, Philadelphia. When the car reached “just a few feet’ from the regular stop at the terminus of the route, the trolley pole slipped from the wire, and since the current was shut off, the motor stopped and all the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Pittsburgh Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. O'Malley v. Laurel Line Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Fordyce v. White Star Bus LinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Margo v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Thomas v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API