Legal Opinion

Hoag v. Chase Pitkin Home & Garden Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this negligence action against Chase Pitkin Home and Garden Center (Chase Pitkin), and Chase Pitkin commenced a third-party action against Tilepak America, Inc. (Tilepak), for common-law indemnification and contribution. After plaintiffs and representatives of Chase Pitkin were deposed, Chase Pit-kin and Tilepak executed a stipulation of discontinuance of the third-party action pursuant to CPLR 3217 (a) (2). Thereafter, plaintiffs moved to compel Tilepak to comply with their demand for discovery made before the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. County of Westchester v. Welton Becket AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. County of Westchester v. Welton Becket AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C.W. Brown, Inc. v. HCE, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Hoag v. Chase Pitkin Home & Garden CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Gonzalez v. United Parcel ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API