Legal Opinion

Biggs v. Cooper

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2014No. CV-14-0132-PRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BERCH,

opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether a group of legislators who voted against House Bill (“HB”) 2010 has standing to challenge whether it was passed in a constitutional manner. Because the group had enough votes to have blocked the bill if passage required a supermajority vote, the group has alleged an injury sufficient to confer standing.

I. BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In the Fifty-First Arizona State Legislature, representatives introduced HB 2010 to expand Arizona’s indigent healthcare program. HB 2010 includes an assessment on hospitals designed to help fund the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Sears v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Bennett v. NapolitanoArizona Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morrow v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  2. Biggs v. BetlachCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Biggs v. betlach/maciasArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Knight v. FontesArizona Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Montenegro v. FontesArizona Supreme Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API