Harris v. Creveling
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Ottawa. (Arnold, J.) Bill to set aside certain foreclosure proceedings by advertisement, and for other relief. Complainants’ appeal from decree dismissing bill. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Israel V. Harris, Myron Harris, and Miriam, the wife of Myron, executed a mortgage, October 8,' 1874, to defendant Creyeling, on two pieces of land, known as “ Lots One and Two of Section 34," to secure the payment of a note for $1,000 made by Israel V. and Myron Harris. The lots were contiguous, and bordered upon Grand river upon the south. There was a road upon the west side of lot 2, and one upon the north side of both lots. One lot contained 45 acres: the other, 58. Part of lot 1 had been cleared, fenced, and was used for farming. The remainder of the lots was open common, from which the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tousey v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- O'Connor v. KeenanMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Postal v. Home State Bank for SavingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Baratto v. PitcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Cox v. TownsendMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.