Legal Opinion
Yockey v. Norn
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Oscoda. (Simpson, J.)' Bill to restrain the removal of certain timber. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
One Clark, being the owner of land on sections 11, 25, and 33, township 29 N. of range 1 W., made a writing, signed by himself and the defendant, of which a copy follows:
*194“ This agreement, made the 5th 'day of December, 1891, by and between Dayton Clark, of Grayling, Crawford county, Mich., of the first part, and James Norn, of Standish, Arenac county, Mich., of the second part, witnessed:
“That for and in consideration of the sum of $6.00 per M. feet the party of the first part agrees to sell, and hereby does sell, also to cut, skid, and put on cars for said second party, all the timber except…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McLeod v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Parsons v. CampSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
- White v. ElwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1861
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown Lumber Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
- Tripp v. WadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. CusackMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Brown Lumber Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927