Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 26, 1982No. 61354PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this bar disciplinary action the referee has recommended that William T. Mayo be found guilty of violating Disciplinary Rule 7-102(A)(3). This recommendation followed a finding that, without any plausible reason or justification, Mayo concealed or knowingly failed to disclose trust instruments which were necessary “muniments of title” and which he was required by law to reveal. Finding that Mayo’s actions were not of a serious nature, but noting that Mayo’s obstinate refusal to do what he was clearly required to do caused needless legal expense, the referee recommended that William T. Mayo…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Florida Bar v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API