Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hendee v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1956No. 8246Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHoyt, District Judge

I agree with that part of the prevailing opinion which holds that Gail Swan did not lack testamentary capacity. I also agree that a presumption of fraud arises where a confidential adviser is made the beneficiary in a will of a person who relies on his advice and counsel in the making of the will. I also agree that the defendant Macfarlane made a prima facie showing to overcome that presumption. I do not agree with the holding in the opinion that the presumption was not eliminated by such prima facie showing. And, since a rule of evidence adopted by a court of last resort has such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  4. People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Kempsey v. McGinnissMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API