Begay v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Justin Begay, No. CV-21-08049-PCT-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court are the parties’ motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 16 15; 17). Plaintiff seeks relief from a denial of relocation assistance benefits under the 17 Navajo–Hopi Settlement Act by Defendant Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation 18 (“ONHIR”). The Court will grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and deny 19 Plaintiff’s Motion.1 20 I.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dilcia Reyes De Valle v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jose M. Sarvia-Quintanilla v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Edward Ramon MenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Begay v. Office of Navajo & Hopi Indian RelocationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.