Legal Opinion

Jones v. Revell

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1976No. 8888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant contends the district court committed reversible error by granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment because there were material issues of fact to be decided. We disagree.

After accepting payment of money and executing a release of all claims arising out of injuries and damages received in an accident with respondent, appellant filed suit to recover *636other damages attributable to the accident. The complaint did not allege fraud, duress, mistake, or any other legal basis for avoiding the release.

Based on the unchallenged, and apparently valid, release, the district court…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Igert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hustead v. Farmers Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 1974

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferrell v. Southern Nevada Off-Road Enthusiasts, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API