Legal Opinion

Carr v. Nance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 16, 2010No. 10-562PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIM GUNTER, Justice.

[[Appellants, Mike Carr, Michael Carr, C.L. Carr, Jr., C.L. Carr, and Tahoe Gaming, LLC, appeal a jury verdict in favor of appellees Stewart and Pruett Nance. Appellants argue that the circuit court erred in (1) denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and (2) giving a jury instruction regarding punitive damages. Appellees cross-appeal the court’s order of remittitur that reduced Stewart Nance’s compensatory damages from $400,000 to $233,707.42. This case involves an issue of first impression, of public interest, and needing clarification and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Advocat, Inc. v. SauerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Stein v. LukasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Slaubaugh v. SlaubaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Jason Carlton v. Cleburne County, ARCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. BarberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Moss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. Yanmar Co. v. SlaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Bayer CropScience LP v. SchaferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. ProAssurance Indemnity Co. v. MethenySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Carter v. ClineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API