Carr v. Nance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
JIM GUNTER, Justice.
[[Appellants, Mike Carr, Michael Carr, C.L. Carr, Jr., C.L. Carr, and Tahoe Gaming, LLC, appeal a jury verdict in favor of appellees Stewart and Pruett Nance. Appellants argue that the circuit court erred in (1) denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and (2) giving a jury instruction regarding punitive damages. Appellees cross-appeal the court’s order of remittitur that reduced Stewart Nance’s compensatory damages from $400,000 to $233,707.42. This case involves an issue of first impression, of public interest, and needing clarification and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Advocat, Inc. v. SauerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Stein v. LukasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Slaubaugh v. SlaubaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Jason Carlton v. Cleburne County, ARCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Union Pacific Railroad v. BarberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Moss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Yanmar Co. v. SlaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Bayer CropScience LP v. SchaferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- ProAssurance Indemnity Co. v. MethenySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Carter v. ClineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.