Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Sommer

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is an action of tort brought by an employee against his employer, who was not insured under the workmen’s compensation act, G. L. c. 152, to recover compensation for personal injuries. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant brings the case here on exceptions to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict.

There was evidence that the plaintiff, a foreman for the defendant, was riding in a tip cart owned by the defendant and driven by an employee of the defendant, that the plaintiff and the driver were acting within the scope of their employment, and that the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashton v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Young v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Currier v. Whitin Machine WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Howard v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Flaherty v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Demaris v. Van LeeuwenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API