Legal Opinion

People v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2001No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, motion granted and counts one and two of indictment No. 927/96 dismissed. Memorandum: We agree with defendant that the evidence adduced at trial is legally insufficient to establish his guilt of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree (Penal Law § 220.21 [1]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]). Viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), the evidence establishes that defendant, who was located in Rochester, telephoned…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. DowdellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. DOWDELL, KAREEM, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API