Legal Opinion

Canton Co. v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1924No. 2173PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

Canton Company of Baltimore owns and

•operates a concrete pier, known as Pier No. 8, extending south about 1,000 feet into the harbor. The warehouse on the pier was a wooden building, about 500 feet long, 18 feet high, and 100 feet wide. On the east side of the pier is a dock for vessels receiving and discharging cargo. A double line of railroad track, used to convey freight to and from ships, extends along the entire length of the pier on the west ■side. The space between the-wall of the warehouse and the nearer railroad track was used as a platform on which freight was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Ex Parte EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. United States v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. District of Columbia v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Naam Looze Vennoot Schap v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dearborn Marine Service, Inc. v. Chambers & KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Schwerman Trucking Co., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Gartland Steamship Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  4. John I. Hay Co. v. the Allen B. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1954
  5. Norfolk Tidewater Terminals, Inc. v. Wood Towing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API