Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Cossentino

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1975Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge Breitel

(dissenting). I would reverse and order a new trial.

This is a capital case in which the court has the power and the duty to review the facts as well as the law. Hence, the stringent restrictions the court has placed on itself in noncapital cases in reviewing issues of competency at the time of trial are not determinative (see, e.g., People v Reason, 37 NY2d 351, 356, dissenting opn, at pp 359-360; People v Laudati, 35 NY2d 696, 697).

Even in noncapital cases this court has had occasion to reject patently unacceptable expert findings of trial competency, when the record on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. SilverNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. ReasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. People v. SherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API