Legal Opinion

Bayliss v. Bayliss

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 10, 1985No. 84-915Published

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, Chief Judge.

Sua sponte we vacate that portion of the original opinion in this case (Bayliss v. Bayliss, 472 So.2d 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)) which reads as follows:

Utilizing the percentage ratio formula approved by the Florida Supreme Court in Landay v. Landay, 429 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1983), the trial court should have awarded to the husband, Charles Bayliss, his one-half share of the E.F. Hutton account, plus a special equity of one-half of 40/244 (or .082) of the remainder. This computation, of course, is subject to the orders of the trial court to establish parity between the parties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Landay v. LandaySupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Judges of the District Court of Appeal, Fifth DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. Higdon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Bayliss v. BaylissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API