Izer v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Chief Judge.
After a bench trial, David Izer was found guilty of speeding. He appeals from the conviction, claiming that evidence obtained from a laser speed detection device should not have been admitted because the state failed to introduce any evidence establishing the reliability of laser-based speed measuring techniques. We agree.
“In Harper v. State, 249 Ga. 519, 525 (292 SE2d 389) (1982), the Supreme Court held that the test for admissibility of novel scientific evidence is whether the procedure or technique has reached a scientific stage of verifiable certainty, or . . .…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Allison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Lattarulo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- State v. StoaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. AbeskaronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Bravo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Cheatwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.