Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. United States Rubber Reclaiming Works
District Court, W.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by the Philadelphia Rubber Works Company against the United States Rubber Reclaiming Works, in which the defendant’s successor, the'United States Rubber Reclaiming Company, Inc., was brought in as defendant, and later the Madison Tire & Rubber Company, Inc., was also brought in as party defendant by supplemental bill. On motion for decree on bill and answer. Decree ordered in accordance with opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
This suit in equity was brought in October, 1912, against the United States Rubber Reclaiming Works for infringement of the Arthur H. Marks patent, No. 635,141, and for an injunction and an accounting. The patent was held valid and infringed, and an accounting directed. 225 Fed. 789, affirmed 229 Fed. 3.5°,
During the accounting before the master the original defendant. United States Rubber Reclaiming Works, was dissolved, and the United States Rubber Reclaiming Company, Inc., which succeeded to all its property, assets, and liabilities, was substituted by supplemental…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Silver King Coalition Mines Co. of Nevada v. Silver King Consol. Mining Co. of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co. v. DancelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
- Dancel v. Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Dancel v. Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. United States Rubber Reclaiming WorksDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cobb v. Interstate Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936