Hulme v. Renwick
Illinois Supreme Court
The questions presented in these cases are precisely similar. The facts and points raised are fully stated in the opinion of the court. The cases were heard before J. M. Wilson, Judge, at February term, 1855, of the Common Pleas Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSkinner, J.
This was an action of assumpsit. The declaration is as follows:
“ State of Illinois, ) Cook County, ) ss
Cook Coxjnty Court of Common Pleas, of Ecbrury term, A. D. 1855.
Robert L. Renwick, plaintiff in this suit, by Scammon and McCagg, his attorneys, complains of George Hulme and J. Stockton White, now or late co-partners, doing business under the name, style and description of Hulme & White, defendants in this suit, of a plea of trespass on the case on promises.
Eor that, whebeas, one George Hulme, under the style and description of George Hulme, heretofore, to wit: on the sixteenth (16) day of…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Schwerdt v. SchwerdtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
- Post v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894