Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gillum

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1891No. 3024PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion gives a statement of the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HOBBY, Presiding Judge.

The land involved in this suit was originally granted to Asahel Savery by the government of Coahuila and Texas on April 13, 1835. Mrs. Harriet Smith, the appellant, who was intervenor in the court below, claims the land as devisee under the will of her father, the grantee.

The appellees deraign title from and under an act of sale executed in the State of Louisiana on January 5, 1837, by said Savery to one Albert Emanuel, before Wm. Boswell, a notary public in and for the city and parish of Bew Orleans, and two witnesses—Edward Barnett and Francois Moitan—and through a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Du BoseTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Watrous v. McGrewTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Cox v. CockTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Thompson v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Dolan v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  3. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. NilesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Hooks v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. HILL & Jahns v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API