Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dunsil v. Jones Chevrolet Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 2, 1977No. 20371Published

1DissentLewis, Chief Justice

(dissenting) :

The parties agree that this is an action for fraud and deceit arising out of alleged fraudulent representations made in connection with the purchase of an automobile by the respondent. The jury returned a verdict for respondent in the amount of $800.00 actual damages and $5,800.00 punitive damages. Appellant assigns error in the admission of certain testimony, in the refusal of its motions for nonsuit and directed verdict as to both actual and punitive damages, and in the instructions to the jury.

The majority reverses solely upon the ground that the “trial judge jumbled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holland v. Spartanburg Herald-Journal Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Blackmon v. United Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  3. Young v. Goodyear Service StoresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Collopy v. Citizens Bank of DarlingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API