Legal Opinion

State v. Klager

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2011No. 25609PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice (on reassignment).

[¶ 1.] For more than eighty-five years, South Dakota has regulated the business of taxidermy. The regulatory scheme has consistently required licensure, record-keeping, and the production of statutorily enumerated records during normal business hours. A licensed taxidermist was convicted of refusing to produce the required records, a violation of SDCL 41-6-33.1 He challenged his conviction alleging that the production requirement2 violated *50his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches. Both the magistrate court and the circuit court…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Res., Inc. v. Colo. Oil & Gas Conservation Comm'nColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API