Carroll v. Ridgaway
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel county.- Assumpsit by the appellee' against the appellant for services rendered and money advanced, laid out and expended, at defendant’s request. On demand a bill of particulars Was furnished and filed. Pleas, non assumpsit and limitationsj Is/ Exception.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel county.- Assumpsit by the appellee' against the appellant for services rendered and money advanced, laid out and expended, at defendant’s request. On demand a bill of particulars Was furnished and filed. Pleas, non assumpsit and limitationsj Is/ Exception. The plaintiff after giving evidence of the services rendered by him to the' defendant at Poplar Island,-, offered the testimony of William S‘. Ridgaway in regard to the admissions of the plaintiff, which is fully set out in the opinion of this court. The defendant then offered the testimony of…
1Opinion of the CourtLe Grand, C. J.
This is an action of assumpsit, instituted by appellee, to recover compensation for services alleged to have been rendered to the appellant, and for money laid out and advanced for him at his request. Issue was joined on the pleas of non assumpsit and limitations. In compliance with a demand for a bill of particulars, the appellee furnished the one in the record.
The plaintiff, after giving evidence of the services, &c., rendered by him at Poplar Island, proved by William S. Ridgaway, “that in June 1850, the defendant, in company with James Smith and James Treakle, came to Poplar Island, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Armstrong v. Risteau's LesseeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Pegg v. WarfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
- Duvall v. PeachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1843
3Cited by3 opinions
- Byers v. HornerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
- Nutwell v. Tongue's LesseeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
- Knight v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928