Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Coblentz v. City of Novi

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 2006No. Docket 127715Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCorrigan, J.

I concur with the majority in all respects but one. I dissent from its holding that the Court of Appeals erred in affirming summary disposition for defendant on plaintiffs’ request for the “side letters” to the settlement agreement. I believe that the letters were properly ruled exempt from disclosure under the “trade secrets or commercial or financial information” exemption of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), MCL *58315.243(l)(f). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in holding that defendant recorded a description of the side letters within a reasonable time after they were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Herald Co. v. Eastern Michigan University Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Stevenson v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Federated Publications, Inc v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API