Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Burley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Savage, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is an action of replevin brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover the possession of certain property which it is claimed belongs to the Omaha Horse Railway. The plaintiff, who is the owner of the railway, bases his right to recover upon two distinct grounds:

jFirst. By virtue of a chattel mortgage executed by himself as an officer of the railway company, to himself as a creditor.

Second. As purchaser under a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage made by the railway company to Joseph H. Millard as trustee.

The defendant claims the right to the possession of the property in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  2. Wood v. LowryNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Pyle v. WarrenNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Becker v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blackman v. Baxter, Reed & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Darnell v. MackNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Gallagher v. M. E. Smith & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Lancaster County Bank v. GililianNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Sanford v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API