Legal Opinion

Herring v. RL MATHIS CERTIFIED DAIRY COMPANY

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1969No. 25362PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

The Supreme Court’s jurisdiction of this appeal in a damage suit is predicated upon alleged constitutional questions raised by appellant’s amended complaint. For prior appearance, see Bourn v. Herring, 225 Ga. 67 (166 SE2d 89). However, an examination of the allegations of the complaint shows that they do not raise any constitutional question for this court.

In this connection, paragraph 6C of the complaint first alleges that a certain statute is “null and void” since it violates the equal protection provisions of the State and Federal Constitutions for specified reasons.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bourn v. HerringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Dade County v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Head v. Edgar Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. SuttlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Jarvis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herring v. R. L. Mathis Certified Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Ford v. HerbermannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  3. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Model Cleaners & Laundry, Inc. v. Per Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API