Legal Opinion
Durham v. State ex rel. Anderson
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 1892No. 609PublishedCited by 2 opinions
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
This cause was transferred from the Supreme Court to this court. See Durham v. State, ex rel., 133 Ind. 422, S. C. 31 N. E. Rep. 787.
*24The court below overruled the appellant’s demurrer to the appellee’s complaint. The question as to the sufficiency of the third paragraph of the complaint is presented in the argument of counsel.
In that paragraph it was alleged, in substance, that the appellant was, at the commencement of this action, and for ten years then last past had been, a resident of Union Township, Montgomery County, Indiana, and during all that time had been a person of sound mind and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shotwell v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Mitchell v. Board of Commissioners of Leavenworth County, KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Jones v. Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Holly Springs Savings & Insurance v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
- Durham v. State ex rel. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bradley v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1924
- Sisler v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 1905